Categories
Podcasts

YR333 Cheryl, Rachel is Wrong, Opera Queen, and Ben

podcast badge
Lots of guests.

Show notes by Steve Harris (THANK YOU!)
– Intro / mashup
– Cheryl croaks Queefing Queen, honeyyyyyyyy
– Guest: Ben aka Skypanther, who runs qPodder
– Yeast 2 Theme, branding
– Ben makes installers for a gaming company and likes to give oral pleasure
– Pop that pussy
– Phone cuntversation with Cheryl
– Gmail quota exceeded
– More Cheryl
– KarmaBanque
– Wrap up for Sirius
– Zack says the thing about Rapechel Kann is that she is a stupid
bitch for saying “the thing about it is, is…”
– Phone call to Rapechel Kann to get his response
– Girlfriend in a Box at Insane Films
– Listenturd messages: Gladys Mercowski, George W Douche, Regina
Slytherins (???)
– Opposing port security deal to state-owned company in Dubai is racist?
– Penis Cheeney alleged to be drunk at time of shooting
– Irina Slutsky on Geek Entertainment TV
– Skype call from Larry about Lily Pons, booking tickets for the
opera, Machu Picchu, Penis Cheney and stuff
– Republicunts, Alito, Roe v Wade
– Bloke, bloat, dude
– Jason Flatowicz theme

Links:
qPodder
Ragan Fox
KarmaBanque
Insane Films
Rapechel Kann
Geek Entertainment TV

Do your own fucking tags.

By Madge

Lesbian with food allergies.

33 replies on “YR333 Cheryl, Rachel is Wrong, Opera Queen, and Ben”

Oh, no doubt, as the youngins say. Love you, Vadge, despite your whoreship of my cyster.

BTW, as the youngins say, where/when the fuck is the stoma emptying ceremony? I’m fiddn’a fly up there, and I want to get more out of my trip than a cheesy slice of pie.

Okay, honey?

FUCK OFF GLADYS. JUST FUCK OFF HONNNNEEY. If I see you on saturday I am going to cut your stoma so hard… that… emmm… JUST FUCK OFF.

Love you to bits,
Your younger sister,
CHERYL

Honey,

What a sweet thought. Too bad my future hubby had such trouble with his ass that day, and I wasn’t able to make it. Our litte family reunion has to be postpo(r)ned.

Screw Zack, that pretentious academic fuck. Sure, he’s right. But getting all psycho and cunty and calling Rapechel a stupid bitch and a retarded whore for making a simple grammatical mistake? Who cares?

I LOVE Rachel and her dripping wet gobs of goth mascara. Don’t mess with her.

I’m glad to hear you weren’t offended. I knew you wouldn’t be. I hope all is going well for you, and our thoughts are with you! Oh, and, your cunt reaks, get some incense in here or something. 🙂

In Tennessee…

It is unlawful for a person to possess a handgun while under the influence of alcohol or any controlled substance regardless of whether he or she has a lawful permit to carry the handgun.

In my hunter safety book there are a couple of paragraphs about hunting while under the influence of alcohol, however, it does not state any consequences to shooting your bed buddy in the face.

I HATE YOU ALL AND YOU’RE FUCKING WRONG.

GOD DAMN IT.

i am seriously pissed off.

y’all think you are funny and cute, but the truth is, i am slowly growing to loathe myself on behalf of all women for engaging in this shit.

this is not just about this stupid grammar BULLSHIT, because, let’s face it, unfortunately, aspects of grammar, like language, are fluid and slowly evolve over time. shitty ass grammar pisses me off as much as the next person. i am a professional writer and my disgust and dissappointment knows no bounds when i see other so-called writers’ manuscripts and the tragic trainwreck of grammar on what they consider to be professional and submission-ready documents.

a lot of times, the problem stems from a shitty education. but boo hoo for you, read a goddamned book, and figure it out, shitty writer.

but i am just OVER all this. this totally transcends the current situation.

straight up: you all hate me for being an actual woman. (except you, matt. i love u.) JEALOUS MUCH? fuck off.

madge catches me off guard when i am backstage at a fucking CRAZY show in vegas where more gnarly shit happened than i can shake a digereedoo at (and yes, there was a man there with an actual fucking digereedoo…don’t ask)

I CHECKED AND I AM RIGHT. the “is” refers to “thing” in the first example below, and in the second example, the 2nd “is”
refers to “thing about it is”

so you can indeed say:
“the thing about it is that you haters are jealous hairy horomonal MANWHORES.”

but you can also say, and it is indeed grammatically correct (albeit clunky and awkward) to say:
“the thing about it is, is that you haters are fucking serious woman haters and i am not amused.”

and guess what? i am just about over it. no joke.

i am starting to feel like the haters amongst you are analagous to a bunch of good ol’ white boys in black face who found a real live black guy to hang out with you.

you are so excited to say “NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER” to an actual black person, (instead of to each other in black face,) that your fucking nasty KKK skin is starting to show from under the poorly applied shoe polish.

and by the by…its 5 in the morning and i just got home from a 6 hour drive from vegas and am so disgusted with all of this AND with myself for being your uncle tom, that i couldn’t even go to sleep before writing this.

i mantion that in order to acknowledge that YES there are grammar problems in this very comment, so if you are one of the clever fuckwits who thinks it will be cute to mention the grammatical mistakes in here, GRAB “ELEMENTS OF STYLE” AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR CUNT.

oh, i forgot. you don’t have one.

JEALOUS.

p.s. even if i was the most grammatically-devoid human being on the planet, i would still be a better human being than you, oh haterade-drinking one.

my life will continue, my writing career will thrive, and my grammatical idiosyncrasies will be considered brilliant and innovative tools of expression, because i am the hardest working writer you never met.

and when you show up at my book signing or cd release party, sharpie in your sweaty palm, i will kindly smile and sign your shit.

because i am fucking MAGNANIMOUS and KIND-HEARTED and i will pray that my example will one day help you to transcend your bitterness.

you are – and will be at that future moment – a pathetic pimply-assed loser who sits at home trolling the interweb and clit-stroking….oh wait, pardon me, that’s not a clit, its your freakishly tiny cock!

guess what? that still doesn’t make you a girl. not a whit more than getting a sun tan would turn me into a hotty puerto rican.

Oh this reminds me of another thing, the name “Rapechel” is a joke between friends. Using it constantly just makes you look like a fucking tryhard trying to get into their little “clique”. But hey, I’m guilty of using it too.

Here’s what I hear Rachel saying:

At first, I thought that the jokes were funny. Now, I don’t. Now, I find them degrading and I don’t want to be complicit in what I perceive to be woman bashing.

Here’s the way I see it:

First and foremost, these are Rachel’s feelings. Rachel is more than a sideshow attraction on Yeast Radio. She’s a loyal friend and dedicated entertainer. A number of people in the podosphere bash her, and, time and time again, she takes it with a grain of salt. Right now, she’s demanding respect–respect that she’s earned. If she doesn’t want to be the butt of a woman-bashing joke (or hundreds of them, for that matter), I think people should respect her wishes, sans minimizing the import of her emotions, reactions, and reasoning.

Unlike Cheryl, Rachel is a real person. It’s one thing to call a man playing a woman a whore; it’s another thing entirely to call an actual woman a whore.

That said, in the world of Madge Weinstein, the lines get blurred. I do believe that Madge’s Rachel-oriented jokes come from a place of love, which is why I think Rachel’s played along for the last six or so months.

I don’t think it’s unfair for Rachel to say, “Enough is enough.” If anything, I believe her comment pushes many of us (audience members and performers, alike) to examine the way men talk about women. This conversation isn’t an easy one to have, but it’s also one that shouldn’t be dismissed.

I totally agree. It’s part of Madge’s character to be a disgusting, boderline misanthropic lesbian cunt, but when listeners (who don’t have that fictionionalized aspect) insult Rachel in that prissy, bitchy, hateful way I think it’s fucking disgusting.

I don’t think they actually mean what they say and I don’t think they actually hate her but because they have heard Madge make fun of her and hear her take it well (but they’re close friends and Madge is a character) they feel like THEY can talk to her in that demaining way. Wake up, cunts. You’re not Madge. You don’t have any excuse to act that way, especially when you haven’t met her.

I’m very sorry, Rachel, I feel so bad now.

I wrote the above comment (“easily wound up”) in jest. I also wrote the show notes and put “Phone call to Rapechel Kann to get his response”, just because I was trying to write them as Madge might have. Just for fun.

I didn’t mean to undermine you because I thought you wrote you posted your comment in the same spirit that Zack probably made the original grammar comment and Madge posted it. Just for fun.

And now that I’ve read Ragan’s very thoughtful comment and realise that what he is saying is correct and that I was wrong, wrong, wrong to post that comment and nothing is funny anymore.

Rachel, I didn’t mean to offend you and I am truly sorry. From what I know, I think you are an extremely talented and innovative artist, poet and entertainer, and it is clear that you have been an incredible friend to Richard. The eulogy you did for Juan was amazing and profound. Your appearances on Yeast Radio truly enrich the show and I always look forward to them.

I lack the talent to do what you do, I have never been in the spotlight, made fun of by people I’ve never met or had anything I’ve said pulled apart in public. Thinking about it that way made me realise how easily I forgot that you’re a real person with real, deep feelings who could actually be offended by anything I said.

I realise I’m not the one who kicked off the whole grammar debate, but just to say once again that I apologise and you have my newfound and uttermost respect.

I’m very sorry, Rachel, I feel so bad now.

I wrote the above comment (“easily wound up”) in jest. I also wrote the show notes and put “Phone call to Rapechel Kann to get his response”, just because I was trying to write them as Madge might have. Just for fun.

I didn’t mean to undermine you because I thought you wrote you posted your comment in the same spirit that Zack probably made the original grammar comment and Madge posted it. Just for fun.

And now that I’ve read Ragan’s very thought-provoking comment and realise what he is saying is correct and that I was wrong, wrong, wrong to post that comment.

Nothing is funny anymore.

Rachel, I didn’t mean to offend you and I am truly sorry. From what I know, I think you are an extremely talented and innovative artist, poet and entertainer, and it is clear that you have been an incredible friend to Richard. The eulogy you did for Juan was amazing and profound. Your appearances on Yeast Radio truly enrich the show and I always look forward to them.

I lack the talent to do what you do, I have never been in the spotlight, made fun of by people I’ve never met or had anything I’ve said pulled apart in public. Thinking about it that way made me realise how easily I forgot that you’re a real person with real feelings who could actually be offended by anything I said.

I realise I’m not the one who kicked off the whole grammar debate, but just to say once again that I apologise and you have my newfound and uttermost respect.

thanks to all of you for your thoughts. but seriously i mean exactly what i said. this isn’t about my feelings being hurt.

i think my analogy about the black face best sums up what i mean.

i don’t want motherfuckers to tiptoe around me. fuck that.

but just know, if you dish it out, y’alls gonna get it right back.

simple.

fuck you Madge, Chennny shot a guy when he was drunk. There is no need to insult me just because I happen to see the truth about global warming.

Sorry I could not be there today, I always wanted to dress in drag, but never had the opportunity..

fuck the ports. thats what the country deserves.. for them to be sold and sold and sold til eventually satan himself owns them.. or king jesus.. whomever has the cash…

seriusly though.. thats the society you live in.. we live in.. and we allow it to go on.. freemarket.. everythings for sale.. money rules all… this ports deal fits perfectly with those values.

Leave a Reply